MIT camera system captures speed of light
December 13th, 2011
01:42 PM ET

MIT camera system captures speed of light

By Doug Gross, CNN

A trillion exposures per second sounds amazingly fast. But that capacity is what you need in a camera if you're going to capture images of the speed of light.

A team of MIT researchers say they've created a revolutionary camera system that can, literally, render the speed of light in slow motion.

"There's nothing in the universe that looks fast to this camera," said Andreas Velten, a post-doctoral researcher who called the system the "ultimate" version of slow motion.

The imaging system relies on creative use of a streak camera - a tool used for measuring light's intensity. The team set up a series of 500 sensors, each programmed to go off one-trillionth of a second after the last.

The result, shown in a video on MIT's site, makes a laser-generated bolt of light appear as if it were moving slowly through a clear soda bottle.

Watch a video of the MIT imaging system in action.

For perspective on how difficult that is, consider that photons, or light particles, travel about 1 million times faster than a bullet, according to Ramesh Raskar, an associate professor on the team.

MIT researcher Andreas Velten shows off the camera system.

It takes only a nanosecond — a billionth of a second — for light to flash through the bottle. But MIT said it takes researchers about an hour to collect all the data necessary to assemble a video showing the movement of that light. 

For that reason, Raskar calls the new system “the world’s slowest fastest camera.”

Such technology could be used in the medical, science and industrial fields, according to the researchers. It also could aid engineers in the development of better camera flashes.

"Because we can see those photons, we could use them to look inside objects," Velten said.

But don't hold your breath hoping to see one of these on the shelves at Best Buy or Fry's any time soon. The camera setup and laser are worth about $250,000, according to MIT.

Post by:
Filed under: Innovation • Science • Tech • Uncategorized
soundoff (164 Responses)
  1. uroda

    samolotów , byłotajemnicą, moim rojeniem , by nauczyć się lecieć płatowcami . Co w środku wnioskowanie!

    April 14, 2014 at 4:58 pm | Reply
  2. custom battle rome 2

    The witness was? blowing smoke. When Issa asks "Who authorized it IN WASHINGTON?". The next words out of his mouth should be a name or names or "I don't know, we're looking", instead he sheepishly shifted blame to their subordinate offices. The witness was hostile and should be treated as such. In a civil court he would be held in contempt for not answering the question directly, but I guess that's just for us average folk.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hoRt2TutPg&w=640&h=390]

    September 24, 2013 at 9:42 pm | Reply
  3. mount and blade combat

    1. peace 2. chaos, 3. nothing, 4. not what we can hear, 5. animals will own the world,? 6. to become an inteligent human being, 7. yes, 8. nobody knows, 9. couse we want power for ourself and we cant just talk, no we need to kill each other for that for some reason, 10. if everyone just accepted that we are equal than yes, 11. we always progress in anything every second, 12. not sure what that should mean

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-3STqujUS8&w=640&h=390]

    September 17, 2013 at 3:19 pm | Reply
  4. guptil

    Well, If you believe in what you write here, lets agree for an IMPARTIAL INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION as a sane person rather than BIASED BASHING on the Freedom Fighters Tamil Tigers wothout blaming the racist Srilanka who did the Genocide and deny access to any Independent media let alone an independent investigation.

    June 26, 2013 at 9:41 am | Reply
  5. soy candle

    You completed some fine points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found mainly folks will agree with your blog. soy candle http://scentunikue.com

    June 14, 2013 at 9:33 am | Reply
  6. Buy Neopets

    Hi there, just was aware of your blog through Google, and found that it's truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I'll be grateful for those who proceed this in future. Many folks will be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

    January 13, 2013 at 2:16 pm | Reply
  7. Adeelk Illsleyv

    What's up to all, for the reason that I am actually keen of reading this weblogis post to be updated on a regular basis. It carries nice stuff.

    August 6, 2012 at 2:27 am | Reply
  8. cctv surabaya

    Good info, a lot of thanks to the author. It can be incomprehensible to me now, but in common, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and great luck! cctv camera di surabaya

    June 14, 2012 at 10:14 am | Reply
  9. Raffy

    I'm coiuurs if you ever have problems with what people post? Honestly the internet used to be like a different place, except that recently it seems to have become better. Do you agree?

    February 21, 2012 at 11:44 pm | Reply
  10. buy nandrolone

    There are some interesting points in time in this article but I don't know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added whatsnext.blogs.cnn.com to FeedBurner as well

    January 18, 2012 at 4:09 pm | Reply
  11. wali

    " Thanks for the great article its really nice and wealthy. I also enjoy the newsletters of idea connection on https://www.ideaconnection.com/newsletters/signup.html
    its a must read newsletter."

    December 18, 2011 at 3:22 pm | Reply
    • Munashe

      rdkcus1 on February 13, 2011 Well I have three navigator and my brother has the 05 and 09 escelade I have the 1998 2006 and 2011 navigator but I must say I'm not a big fan of the 2011 I favor to tue 2006 it's flashy but not over exagrerating the car I love my 1998 navigator to it's just awesome but I'm thinking about goin to get the 2011 escelade esv platinum over the 2011 navigator

      February 21, 2012 at 10:45 pm | Reply
  12. Coke Bear

    I think everyone is missing the point. This was / is simply a subliminal advertisement for Coke-a-Cola.

    December 14, 2011 at 4:21 pm | Reply
    • Maghpilohpiloh

      SEThatered on April 3, 2011 75000$ 30000$ Are you kdiidng me?Here at Stuttgart university (ger) a group of students constructed, made and installed a prototype. And it was less than 1000$ in total.And it was: carbon-fibre (blades), aluminium (support structure) and concrete (base).Replace cf with glass-fibres and it will be less than 600$.

      February 20, 2012 at 3:10 am | Reply
    • Ellen

      merks62 on June 19, 2007 A full rieooratstn of this car would be unfortunate, in my opinion. After all, the way this Plymouth acquired its patina is as unique as it gets!

      February 21, 2012 at 8:42 pm | Reply
  13. David

    Sulu, Fire Photon torpedo's.

    December 14, 2011 at 8:27 am | Reply
  14. RICH G

    Call me simple minded, but if the light only traveled so far in the bottle how did the defused light travel far enough to reach the cameras?It would seem the camera would have to be closer than the distance the light traveled to record it and if that were true then how could the short "distance" be recorded? I be confused! ;-)

    December 13, 2011 at 9:44 pm | Reply
    • wade

      very very good point!

      December 14, 2011 at 6:34 pm | Reply
    • Bero

      nmeoreprettyfacos on September 25, 2011 omg the sauve thing was so corny lol but hey its 2 free products so ill do it. i love your channel and facebook and site so great! im kat elliott on facebook it really would be great to have a forum and your site would be perfect for that

      February 19, 2012 at 4:47 pm | Reply
    • Rakesh

      Getting to the root of a dcfuiiflt situation begins with looking for the answer. While may seem hard to comprehend but a lot hard times exist from the premise, not the conclusion.

      February 22, 2012 at 1:11 am | Reply
  15. Bruce

    Well, I for one am really glad we got all this cleared up. This was keeping us all awake nights. I thin k it was actually a root beer bottle, which would alter the scientific result by about three and one half picoseconds, bu that's neither here nor there.

    December 13, 2011 at 6:01 pm | Reply
  16. The Real Bristol Palin

    My mother Sarah likes to 'do me' with her strap-on.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:56 pm | Reply
    • Joe

      Yes, but is her strap-on a Coke bottle?

      December 13, 2011 at 5:03 pm | Reply
  17. Joe

    They had to use something like a bottle that would diffuse light outward towards the lens of the camera. Otherwise, you could not capture light from point A to point B without sensors being in the pathway of the light and only capturing light once it hits said sensors.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:50 pm | Reply
    • Joe

      So in this photo, light is inside the bottle and on its way to the other end... but you can't see that light because it hasn't reflected or diffused to the lens.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:52 pm | Reply
  18. svann

    Would it have been too much to expect to see the actual video instead of a still photo? I know I might not be able to garner much information but Id think that based on the content of the story it would be natural to show it.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:36 pm | Reply
    • einstein

      A picture is worth a thousand words or in your case, maybe not. Concept, execution, move on.

      December 13, 2011 at 6:07 pm | Reply
  19. Chuck Anziulewicz

    This is quite fascinating, but it is actually not the first time a pulse of laser light has been caught on film. MANY years ago I remember seeing a still photograph of a pulse of laser light, perhaps an inch or so long, passing through a glass bottle filled with water. I tried Googling the image, but without success.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:35 pm | Reply
    • Atutt

      Overall I apemttt and consume my mix of Vitamin C from pills. While I'd really prefer to via a excellent meal plan it can be even more hard to at all times.

      February 22, 2012 at 1:07 am | Reply
  20. Greg

    I never bought into he speed of light either. If two particles are traveling away from each other – both traveling 'almost' the speed of light – relative to the particle you're satnding on, the other will appear to be moving away at 'almost' twice the speed of light! Am I right?

    December 13, 2011 at 4:34 pm | Reply
    • Joe

      What if you spin the interior of a disc to the speed of light... the exterior would necessary be traveling faster than that.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:46 pm | Reply
    • tony

      No.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:47 pm | Reply
    • Sunil

      You make an interesting point. Mathematically speaking you are correct.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:50 pm | Reply
    • Joe

      p.s. The other particle won't "appear" as anything... because it is moving away and never landing on your retina.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:53 pm | Reply
    • Nope

      Not according to Einstein. I may not fully understand relativity, but I Einstein is a safer bet than Greg

      December 13, 2011 at 4:56 pm | Reply
    • Jacob

      The distance between the two photons of light in the scenario you describe will be increasing at twice the speed of light. That perception would be relative to an observer outside either photon. If you were "on" the photon you would perceive nothing at all about the other photon, because information about the other photon's state cannot travel faster than light.

      A more interesting scenario is if you were travelling on a photon in one direction and another photon was sent in the same direction 5 seconds later. If you ever measure the second photon, only 5 seconds of time will have passed, even if you travelled 100,000 lightyears before measuring it. This is called "time dilation".

      December 13, 2011 at 5:26 pm | Reply
      • Alexandru

        MyFreeProductSamples on September 25, 2011 @myabigail100 Hey, I got a dry shmapoo, a shmapoo, and a conditioner. I did get them all at Target but in two shopping trips. Yes, I had to pay tax on them. Do you mean Target has a policy on only 2 free products/person or the Suave coupon does? I did the Suave video twice. Once at my home computer and once on my laptop. So the first time, I got a coupon for 1 free product and the second time I got a coupon for 2 free products. I hope I answered your questions

        February 19, 2012 at 3:51 pm |
    • John

      the speed of light is the same no matter where you are observing it from. It is a physical constant. Doesn't make sense? It shouldn't. You'll need to factor in time and space warping for the math to work out. Anything moving this fast affects the time and space grid around it quite a bit.

      December 13, 2011 at 5:32 pm | Reply
    • Dan Sutton

      Wrong. No matter who is observing it, including the photons themselves, they'll be travelling away from each other at the speed of light. Time dilates to cope. This has to do with inertial frames of reference (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity) - in any event, no two objects can ever be seen by anyone to have more than the speed of light as their relative speeds.

      December 13, 2011 at 6:22 pm | Reply
  21. trekkie

    I don't think we were seeing photons. You don't "see" a phonton; you see the effects of the photon. Same with wind.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:29 pm | Reply
    • Panjul

      aitunspzd on October 20, 2011 how about The One starring Jet Li. Gameplay would be RPG story would be similar to actual movie. Semi-Super cop chasing a criminal who is trying to go around killing himself in different dimensions to power himself up and he ends up being the character you play etc etc etc

      February 19, 2012 at 7:46 pm | Reply
      • Gohar

        Ali Harkness – I'm so happy to see that first picture again. I love it! I can't wait to live ceslor hopefully sometime we'll get to meet our friend Owen!February 8, 2010 7:59 PM

        March 18, 2012 at 8:49 pm |
  22. Max

    If nothing is faster than the speed of light, and the camera can capture the speed of light, then the camera is faster than the speed of light. Back to the drawing board on e=mc^2.

    December 13, 2011 at 4:25 pm | Reply
    • Nope

      According to your logic our eyes won't be able to see since it would require our eye to sense faster than light? The camera isn't racing against the light.

      December 13, 2011 at 5:00 pm | Reply
    • John

      I agree with Nope.

      The camera uses a series of sensors, not just one. If it was just one, then you would be right: the sensor would have to be faster than the speed of light. But that is not the case. They triggered the sensor one-billionth of a second apart so that when put together, we can have a slow motion video of light. Each sensor, by itself, are by no means faster than the speed of light.

      December 13, 2011 at 5:35 pm | Reply
  23. npg

    ...So finally we can capture on film my girlfriend eating a pizza!!

    December 13, 2011 at 4:24 pm | Reply
  24. Arden Rynew

    I'm sure that MIT has stubbed it's toe in an attempt to create headlines. Having worked with Photo Optical Systems for some time, I'm sure they are only measuring the "Light Up Time" of their Electro Optical Capturing System. Things are difficult enough in basic research without headline grabbing techniques being put on display. The research and understanding of light is an important part of the knowledge about our world. MIT should try to regulate stories of this sort.

    Respectfully,
    Arden Rynew

    December 13, 2011 at 4:17 pm | Reply
    • Sidney

      jdludeuex on January 15, 2010 Sure, buy a cheap car from a country that hates Americans more than the al-Qaida. Korean limits all American imports to their country but we accept all their crap thus adding to our National debt. Buy American? and keep America financially strong. Remeber: Kia in Korean means BIG AMERICAN LOSER

      February 21, 2012 at 10:16 pm | Reply
  25. Dan

    Sweet! Now we can settle this neutrino question with an old fashion photo finish!

    December 13, 2011 at 4:01 pm | Reply
  26. mary

    I wonder what this might capture that we don't see other than light~!!! ?
    Amazing, I am curious what else is there that moves too fast to be seen~!

    December 13, 2011 at 3:55 pm | Reply
    • davetharave

      Questionable political maneuverings by the U.S. Congress

      December 13, 2011 at 4:20 pm | Reply
    • Joe

      Elves!

      December 13, 2011 at 5:03 pm | Reply
  27. gate106

    can they do it to the sun to slow the day down

    December 13, 2011 at 3:52 pm | Reply
  28. RodRoderick

    Ohh! I think I saw a god particle

    December 13, 2011 at 3:51 pm | Reply
  29. TasteTest

    Would this work with an empty bottle of Pepsi as well?

    December 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm | Reply
    • Sancho

      Yes, why wouldn't it?

      December 13, 2011 at 3:48 pm | Reply
    • Likealion

      No Pepsi....Coke.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:03 pm | Reply
  30. Jeremy

    Thank you for showing us what we already know.

    December 13, 2011 at 3:32 pm | Reply
    • EatYouAlive

      We already knew you were stupid, yes.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:50 pm | Reply
  31. meki60

    its not as fast as Obama can provide stimulus funds to re-election supporters

    December 13, 2011 at 3:27 pm | Reply
    • JohnRJ08

      Jerk. Go listen to your favorite high school graduates, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:48 pm | Reply
      • Primarch

        Wow, another Kool-aid drinker...support your savior even though he's proven himself a joke...

        December 13, 2011 at 4:05 pm |
      • Ogre

        Nerd!

        December 13, 2011 at 4:06 pm |
    • tony

      Good point.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:17 pm | Reply
  32. AJ

    Looks like a coke bottle on its side.....

    December 13, 2011 at 3:20 pm | Reply
  33. Joe

    All this type of work will soon come to an end anyway.

    Something far more important is being secretly pushed through right *now* while you're Xmas shopping... it's called the National Defense Authorization Act. This scary thing declares the whole of the United States a "war zone" and says that anyone may be detained indefinitely for any reason without trial or access to attorney. This applies to all Americans on American soil, and yet 99.9% of Americans know nothing about it

    December 13, 2011 at 3:16 pm | Reply
    • Snacklefish

      If it's so secret, how do you know about it?

      December 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm | Reply
    • Hey You

      Not very secret – a copy of the bill is available for viewing by the public. Also, you need to be declared a terrorist to be detained. I thought Obama said he was against all the heavy-handed anti-terrorist measures, but he is in favor of this one. Seems to be some disconnect between what he promised to do and what he is actually doing.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:42 pm | Reply
      • WD1

        @HEYYOU
        ..."Seems to be some disconnect between what he promised to do and what he is actually doing." ...
        Are you kidding ??? There are so many disconnects between what he promised to do and what he has done, this 500 camera array couldn't capture them all.... Guess that's what happens when our President golfs 80 times, takes numerous "vacations" and campaigns non-stop....

        December 13, 2011 at 5:30 pm |
    • cf100

      And how is this relevant to the article?

      December 13, 2011 at 3:44 pm | Reply
    • EatYouAlive

      BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS BLACK HELICOPTERS

      December 13, 2011 at 3:52 pm | Reply
  34. Joe

    O, how I long for my simple hobbit hole back in the shire.

    December 13, 2011 at 3:14 pm | Reply
    • Rod C. Venger

      Willard walked up to me and asked what I was doing. I replied, "At the moment, answering your stupid question".

      December 13, 2011 at 3:22 pm | Reply
      • Shane

        Um, actually he didn't have a question and you didn't actually respond to it, you commentated what you thought about what he said... maybe you shouldn't try and troll anymore.

        December 13, 2011 at 4:34 pm |
  35. Mr. Sinister

    Meanwhile, as government-funded scientists spend $250,000 to watch light pass through a plastic soda bottle, a homeless vet begs for change on the inner city streets...

    December 13, 2011 at 2:54 pm | Reply
    • Michael J.

      You're a moron.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:00 pm | Reply
    • blackfire

      You're an idiot.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:06 pm | Reply
    • ItSOnLyME

      So we should abandon all science until poverty is eliminated? Right.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:06 pm | Reply
    • Cason

      Where does it say that it was government-funded? I must have missed that. Considering that MIT is private, the natural assumption should be it was privately funded. Your conclusion is probably why you weren't the one who invented this, or anything on this level.

      Think of it this way, take the "teach a man to fish" philosophy and extrapolate it. Such as – "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach humanity the many secrets of the universe and the whole species will prosper.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:08 pm | Reply
      • Shane

        ^This

        December 13, 2011 at 4:41 pm |
    • Jim

      You should be ashamed of yourself for not taking himself into your home.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:10 pm | Reply
    • jayh

      I smell idiot.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:28 pm | Reply
    • marc

      Clearly you have no vision. You don't have any idea what this mean and what it could do to improve the lives of many people. Without science and experiment with would still be living in stone age.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm | Reply
    • Biff

      The typical tired response to funding science. "Why spend money on science stuff when there's so many problems in the world?" This is the same thing as saying: "Why spend money on things which may contribute to improving the world when there's so much wrong with the world?" It circular reasoning.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:20 pm | Reply
    • tony

      I'll never read another science article until all the homeless vets are off the street.

      December 13, 2011 at 4:51 pm | Reply
  36. t

    WOW! Now to think of a practical application for it. Since all communication travels at the speed of light (ie. radio waves- you know, for TV & such), what can capturing light & being able to "freeze frame" it accomplish? We read chemical signatures from all of our observable cosmos using light, already. It will be interesting to see if a good use can be made of these cameras.

    December 13, 2011 at 2:44 pm | Reply
    • Not a physicist

      Imagine taking before and after pictures with simple technology. Now imagine many more befores and afters that can now be captured and viewed such as when various changes occur in any myriad of process. I think there could be many uses for such an application as described in the story.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:51 pm | Reply
      • t

        I get it. A slower playback may reveal more detail of what changes. I guess my head was too much "out there" to grasp a more earthly application:)

        December 13, 2011 at 2:55 pm |
      • Rod C. Venger

        I wanna see a nuke go off close up and in super-super-super-duper slo-mo! How about they do that experiment over Tehran?

        December 13, 2011 at 3:18 pm |
      • Mariaya

        Thank you for your help!Thank you and My best rdagres! Thank you and Sorry for so many questions but i really need your help.

        February 22, 2012 at 12:23 am |
    • Nigama

      Better lighting in video games!

      December 13, 2011 at 2:53 pm | Reply
    • Sachin

      Muriness1 on November 20, 2008 KIA does make good cars, I own a KIA (2004 Kia Optima) and its very reialble, saves gas and NEVER LEFT ME STRANDED. KIA does not have Toyotas reputation BUT KIA has come a LONG way from what they used to be. and TOYOTA and HONDA started off just like KIA did.

      February 21, 2012 at 10:04 pm | Reply
  37. Kenye Vest

    Yo, MIT, Imma let you finish inna minute, but I just gotta say that tachyons are the best particles of ALL TIME! ALL TIME!

    December 13, 2011 at 2:33 pm | Reply
    • Know Your Meme Limits

      Wasn't funny the first billion times.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:04 pm | Reply
      • know your jerks

        You're a jerk

        December 13, 2011 at 5:33 pm |
    • Amin

      DynamicoDesigns on June 24, 2011 As one of my past eymlopers of over five years, I loved my job at 24-Hour Fitness I'm on a different career path these days (web developer), but always have great memories of working there Great video and thanks for being part of the equality for all' movement we are all equals.

      February 22, 2012 at 12:45 am | Reply
  38. shadowram

    Wonder if the scientist's at CERN could use this with their Higgs Bosom project?

    December 13, 2011 at 2:29 pm | Reply
    • dbarak

      I see what you did there bra! ; )

      December 13, 2011 at 2:40 pm | Reply
      • blackfire

        lol

        December 13, 2011 at 3:01 pm |
  39. ArtInChicago

    Help me on this, to capture the speed of something, the recording device has to be as fast/faster than that thing. We know the speed of light is a theoretical limit, so there isn't a device that will travel faster (I know warp and the like), so did the bottle (and atmosphere) slow light down sufficiently to have the device record it?

    December 13, 2011 at 2:25 pm | Reply
    • MrBo

      Did you read the article? It clearly states the system is composed of 500 sensors firing in sequence. The SYSTEM as a whole captures the sequence. Nothing in the camera system actually travels faster than light. It's like having 500 cameras, one shooting after the other. All you have to do is control the time delay between each shot.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:33 pm | Reply
    • Jeff_in_Dallas

      I wondered the same thing at first. My understanding is that the "camera" is not a traditional lens and shutter system like we typically think of, but 500 linked sensors that each take an exposure one trillionith of a second after the previous, in succession. That way you can link the images together to form a video, but the shutter doesn't have to move faster than the speed of light, which is impossible.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:35 pm | Reply
    • SiidAirfoil

      You're not looking at it correctly. The camera doesn't MOVE faster than the speed of light. It snaps photos fast enough to show the front of a light beam at one position in one photo and in a second position in the next photo. As long as the pics are snapped at one/nanosecond, you should be able to see the light change position by about 1 foot between consecutive frames.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:37 pm | Reply
    • UtahJohn

      The sensors are not moving. The "shutters" in the sensors must open and close fast enough to capture the bolt of light as it passes through the bottle. Just think of a photography on the sidelines a a track meet. The people run the camera is usually stationary.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:38 pm | Reply
    • Paul

      The camera takes pictures of instantaneous events, at a high frame rate. The ultimate limit for frame rate is infinity, where it stops being a frame, and becomes a live and seamless event. Speed, such as light, is a rate over time, and quite the opposite of an instantaneous event. You can't measure speed instantaneously, speed has to be an average. Trying to record an instantaneous speed is the same as dividing by zero, it can't be done. The camera is not traveling like the light is, the camera is simply making so many observations, that it can see light travel.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:43 pm | Reply
    • Not a physicist

      Also don't forget that the speed of light as a limit is being challenged. New theories beyond Einstein's The Theory of Relativity are being explored all the time.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm | Reply
    • ArtInChicago

      Mr.Bo, YES I read the article. Then this is no different than recording the info from a particle accelerator. The aggregate records the event, not a single camera. That was my confusion. Thanks for those that contributed.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:48 pm | Reply
      • Xolisile

        I?m not that much of a irtennet reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up! I'll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future. Cheers

        February 19, 2012 at 11:35 am |
    • Nigama

      It's like the very large panorama pics, where the camera sweeps across from one end to the other. My class pic was like that. Kids used to start at the beginning end, duck down behind the back row, sprint down to the other end and be in the same picture twice, on both ends. They just do it with a laser, and use a mirror to do the movement so they can get all angles of the light. They then combine all the different pictures (which were taken at different times) into one complete picture. Even tho it's an amalgamation, it still clearly shows how light moves. Hope that helps.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:51 pm | Reply
    • Sajor

      No, what they basically did, was use a number of "cameras" that recorded the even sequentially. ie; at a trillionth of a second one after the other. That is also the way film works in a motion picture (although with a single camera at much slower sequential speed) and that is why it takes them so long to gather all the data and assembled it in the form of a video. Pretty ingenious.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:54 pm | Reply
    • Nonimus

      Actually, I think their process was even more complex.
      Based on the linked video, I think, they basically did a 500 line scan as each trillionth of a sec position. Their light source is a laser that emits pulses of light a such a high rate that it looks like a continuous beam. By timing the exposure of a single-line sensor camera at the same trillionth of a sec, which would put the light pulse at the same physical position in the scene, and then repeating for each of the 500 "streak" (or line) sensor, you would have one "frame" of the video.
      Reset for next position, i.e. next determined trillionth of a second pulse position, and repeat for next frame.

      At 32 frames per sec for standard video, that would be 500x32x60=960000 exposures per minute of video.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:19 pm | Reply
      • Nonimus

        Anyone ever use a timing light to set the ignition timing on a car? That's what it reminds me of, but at one line (or streak) per exposure.

        December 13, 2011 at 3:35 pm |
      • SenorCovert

        You're pretty much correct. if you want more information about it just google "raskar" and "trillionfps" first link is the MIT project page for this. i'd have provided the link myself but cnn won't allow it.

        December 13, 2011 at 5:56 pm |
  40. Gary

    Anyone need a Coke?

    December 13, 2011 at 2:23 pm | Reply
  41. bob ho

    How many people starved to death during this project?

    December 13, 2011 at 2:22 pm | Reply
    • rich

      Not enough. At 7.2 billion people, simple will tell you we will strave ourselves to death within 30 years at the present rate of growth.

      From 1800 – 1954 2.4 Billion
      1954 – Present 7.2 Billion

      December 13, 2011 at 2:28 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      Your point?

      December 13, 2011 at 2:30 pm | Reply
    • G. Lang

      So what's your point. The world should abandon science while there are hungry people on the planet? Perhaps a tad shortsighted?

      December 13, 2011 at 2:33 pm | Reply
    • Brad

      How many medical technologies came out of the space program? Stop being a narrow minded buffoon.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:38 pm | Reply
      • Chris

        3

        December 13, 2011 at 2:48 pm |
    • MarkinFL

      How many people starved to death while you shopped for the computer that let you post your message?

      December 13, 2011 at 2:42 pm | Reply
      • Nancy Pelosi

        I have absolutely no problem kicking in the proceeds from a few of my broomsticks if that will help you...

        December 13, 2011 at 2:56 pm |
    • twz130

      (rolling my eyes) ....bob ho, guess you better stop wasting time reading this article and start helping some starving people

      December 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm | Reply
      • Erica

        You have spoke about saverel curious things here. I came across this article by using Bing and I have to admit that I already subscribed for your site, it is very fine (;

        February 21, 2012 at 11:20 pm |
    • Paul

      Are you saying they didn't drink the Coke?

      December 13, 2011 at 2:51 pm | Reply
    • Nonimus

      How many lives will be saved by a sonagram-like device using light and other em spectrum radiation?

      December 13, 2011 at 3:23 pm | Reply
      • Hendrik

        Heck, even a llitte mouse munching on lunch in a field knows it had better haul butt when it is suddenly darkened by a shadow.That was one of the funniest lines I've read this week!

        February 19, 2012 at 3:07 pm |
    • Nonimus

      @bob ho,
      "How many people starved to death during this project?"
      Didn't someone say the same thing to Jonas Salk?

      December 13, 2011 at 3:25 pm | Reply
    • jayh

      Sadly, not you...

      December 13, 2011 at 3:29 pm | Reply
    • jeff

      Oh who cares. Are we supposed to stop human progress because someone is dying?

      December 13, 2011 at 4:38 pm | Reply
      • Irsi

        Out of the many, many qeoutisns I've seen on this site, that's the best one yet, well done mate. Such an obvious question that nobody has thought to ask it, plus a great answer.

        February 19, 2012 at 2:36 pm |
      • FabioManxio

        Very good siogestugns, you just gained a brand new reader. What would you suggest in regards to your post that you made a few days ago?

        February 22, 2012 at 12:40 am |
    • JohnW

      More science bad! More food good! *chest-beat* *chest-beat* *chest-beat*

      December 13, 2011 at 5:24 pm | Reply
  42. chris

    Instead of everyone commenting on how it is just a picture of a light on a bottle, how about you follow the posted link to youtube in the middle of the article and watch the actual video of the light traveling through the lightbulb. These guys don't work at MIT for no reason.

    December 13, 2011 at 2:19 pm | Reply
    • chris

      Throught the bottle I meant.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:20 pm | Reply
    • Alysson

      slairbacruz on September 19, 2011 have anyone of you tried GETFREENEOPOINTS(dot)COM? it works perfectly fine here. I got 10,000 neopoints roughly in 10 minutes.

      February 19, 2012 at 11:29 pm | Reply
  43. conoclast

    Why do these science-eggheads insist on chasing moonbeams when they should be out working for a living? If "education" makes you think moonbeams are more important than making a living then maybe it's time we DID scrap all forms of it, like our wise republican bretheren propose! What possible good is being smart if you refuse to get in line?

    December 13, 2011 at 2:17 pm | Reply
    • awtpSIM

      So simple minded. I would say it's a shame, but... Well... You wouldn't understand.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:24 pm | Reply
    • Dizzy Buzz

      He's getting paid to chase moonbeams while most of us are toiling for "the man" at some mundane, unimpressive task.

      He wins.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:37 pm | Reply
    • D

      How can you not grasp that understanding the world allows things like micro-chips to be developed, or new ways to treat injuries/sickness, etc. Every new discovery is merely a stepping stone to create new or improve on existing technology.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:40 pm | Reply
      • Nunya

        Too busy watching videos on all the technology that's been made possible and available by all the basic research that came before.

        All i can say is that it's a good thing that they weren't trying to film light (or thought or anything else) moving through some of these peoples' skulls...

        December 13, 2011 at 2:59 pm |
    • Brad

      It's this type of technology that leads to advances in areas they never expected. Penicillin came out of moldy bread. Smoke detectors came out of the Apollo program. Open your eyes.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:41 pm | Reply
    • vbscript2

      It's kind of sad to see that liberals don't even understand sarcasm from their own.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:44 pm | Reply
    • Howard

      They ARE working for a living, idiot! If everyone thought like you, we'd all probably still be sitting in outhouses instead of on flush toilets. We pay for basic research because nobody has ever been consistently successful at predicting which forms of research will yield useful technological advances, some of which even you, concoclast, make use of.

      Ignorance is tolerable; stupidity is forever. For the ignorant, we educate; for the stupid, we pray.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:45 pm | Reply
      • dbarak

        "Thomas Edison, you come in here right this minute! Stop fooling around with those glass bubbles you've been making and go buy some candles! It's almost dark!"

        December 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm |
      • Rangith

        KuBeRkId on October 31, 2011 i poersnaly think this give away is going to be the best of all because that 2x2x1 is amazing and im trying to buy on but it would be gr8 to get it from my hero

        February 19, 2012 at 9:39 pm |
    • Nonimus

      @conoclast,
      And yet you wasted enough time learning to read and (sort of) write, use a computer, etc.
      Why don't you go dig a ditch or something? I'm sure that would be more productive than espousing your opinion on blog site, at least for you anyway.

      December 13, 2011 at 3:30 pm | Reply
  44. gfdfrdrcdrekk

    drone technology travels faster than light

    December 13, 2011 at 2:14 pm | Reply
  45. Fupped duck

    I saw the image of Satan in the light in the coke bottle. This is obviously Darwinian propaganda & should be immediately halted..A stop that stem cell stuff while your at it.....Signed Newt

    December 13, 2011 at 2:12 pm | Reply
  46. yo4realD

    I KNOW IT SOUNDS LAME BUT THIS TECHNOLOGY IS VERY VERY PROMISING CONSIDERING THAT ONE TECHNOLOGY MAY BE THE MOTHER OF A NEW ONE...WITH THE SAME CONCEPT BUT MORE USEFUL...IT'S THE WAY TECHNOLOGY WORKS...HAYLOW HAY-D-ONDOWS...

    December 13, 2011 at 2:11 pm | Reply
  47. Omar Rosales

    There will be some applications in Astronomy. Cool Stuff!!!

    December 13, 2011 at 2:06 pm | Reply
  48. Neeneko

    While a setup that impressive is obviously outside the reach of hobbists.. I wonder if the same basic technique could be used to produce DIY high speed cameras of lower quality....

    December 13, 2011 at 2:03 pm | Reply
  49. Mike

    @Carter – What's point? Light traveling through a medium that you can photograph. Makes sense to me.

    December 13, 2011 at 2:01 pm | Reply
    • Carter Mandrik

      It wasn't a serious comment Mike. The headline of the article got my expectations up very high, so I was expecting to see some amazing image of what light actually looked like in slow motion. Granted that probably was an unrealistic expectation, but still I was disappointed to see a hazy picture of a Coke bottle.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:08 pm | Reply
      • chris

        If you would have followed the link to youtube you would see the actual video.

        December 13, 2011 at 2:17 pm |
  50. Justin

    Simply amazing!

    December 13, 2011 at 2:00 pm | Reply
    • Edwin

      Agreed.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:19 pm | Reply
  51. Carter Mandrik

    That's just a 2-liter plastic Coke bottle turned on it's side. What do these scientists take us for??

    December 13, 2011 at 1:57 pm | Reply
    • Terry

      I concur. Maybe we should get the Nobel Prize for uncovering this hype.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:02 pm | Reply
    • Levi

      you're a dolt... thats the light going through the bottle. they captured the light before it went all the way through.

      December 13, 2011 at 2:09 pm | Reply
      • Carter Mandrik

        You are a genius. Thank you so much for explaining it to me in terms I could understand.

        December 13, 2011 at 2:24 pm |
    • Cleide

      knlivec13 on November 3, 2011 Look forward to seeing you this year at our Image Style Studio stand, bringing Hollywood to Perth.

      February 19, 2012 at 6:42 pm | Reply
    • luis

      I have been in slmiiar situations before. Its not as easy solution as you thought it is, its something that you'll have to write out for yourself over a period of time.

      February 22, 2012 at 2:22 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.